Would you pay for Open Source Software

Recently Peter Toft wrote a blog entry (in Danish) entitled Hånden på hjertet: Vil du betale for Open Source?, which roughly translates into
Honestly, would you pay for Open Source?

The blog post and the associated comments are all in Danish, but those who answered yes can be split into three groups (I’m generalizing a bit here, read the comments, if you want the details)

  • Yes, and I do occasionally. Either through one-time donations or buying merchandise.
  • Yes, and I have some sort of monthly subscription/membership, like jointhegame.kde.org/ or FSF.
  • Yes, but I don’t know where to throw my money.
    If I had to support the development of all the (open source) software I use, it would ruin me, because I use so many open source programs. If there was a central place I could pay, and have my money distributed, that would work for me.

I myself belong in the first category, mainly through merchandise purchases.
But I must admit that I do share some of the thoughts of the people in the last category. If I want to donate my money to pay for developer hours and I don’t want the hassle of shopping around, to locate and distribute money to all the many projects deserving support, where do I go?

So I would like to bring Peters question to the wider audience of Planet Ubuntu. (If you found this blog post through some other means, feel free to share your thoughts as well).

Would you pay for Open Source Software?

If yes, what would/do you pay for?
A specific product, monthly subscriptions, merchandise or something else?

If no, why not?
Is free the most important aspect of Free Software?
Are there to many places to throw your money, so you choose not to at all?

Would you be interested in donating to some sort of foundation, whose sole purpose it was to pay Open Source developers to work full time on what ever project they were working on?
Photo by: Philip Taylor

That’s a good thing?

I just saw a video by IBMs A Smarter Planet Blog about some of the things we can expect from cities of the future. The intelligent water system that detects leaks seems neat, but I’m not fond of the use of mathematics and software to prevent diseases from spreading. It seems very easy to use this data and knowledge to quarantine (or worse) people, maybe even before they are infected.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m7ticc7jnE

Also, the crime prevention system seems to make it possible to turn thought crime illegal, and making it possible to convict people for crimes they may commit in the future. Sounds like Minority Report, just with statistical analysis instead of mutants able of precognition.

Photo by: Gene Hunt

Firefox 3.5

Mozilla Firefox 3.5 is here!

Watch Mike Beltzner (Director of Firefox) talk about what’s new:

And while we are watching videos, who doesn’t like a good car analogy, when explaining software?

mozilla firefox 3.5 from vineel reddy on Vimeo.

Get it here: http://getfirefox.com.
I haven’t seen an Ubuntu package yet, but I guess it won’t be long.

Jalousi er en grim ting

Just installed ubuntu on gf’s laptop… Now I’m jealous!

Fra etj i forgårs

Hvis Ubuntu kan gøre en inkarneret Mac bruger jaloux, så er vi ved at være der!

Beskeden fra hans kæreste (som vist har kørt med Windows XP tidligere) var i øvrigt

Program/OS working amazingly

Det er altid rart at høre fra glade ‘kunder’.

Dansk-gruppen har brug for din hjælp…

Dansk-gruppen (dem der oversætter teksten i fri / åbne programmer til dansk) har brug lidt feedback fra deres brugere. Så hvis du benytter dig af deres arbejde (altså, hvis du bruger OOS programmer på dansk), så brug et par minutter på at udfylde deres spørgeskema. Du skal bare pege din browser (eller hedder det netlæser?) hen på denne adresse:
http://tinyurl.com/cva4vh

Sikkerhed!

Martin spørger:

Men hvis du skulle pege på én grund, og det må ikke være pris, til at folk skulle vælge Ubuntu (eller anden linux distro), hvad ville det så være?

Mit svar er sikkerhed! Der er to store aspekter af it sikkerhed. Det ene er brugerens forståelse af systemet, det andet er software. En bruger der forstår mulige sikkerhedshuller vil være bedre i stand til at mindske sin egen risiko. Dette er fuldstændig uafhængigt af hvilket system der anvendes.
Det andet aspekt – software – er selvfølgelig vanskeligt at vurdere pga. de meget komplekse problemstillinger, men min vurdering er at Linux (og hermed også Ubuntu) er mere sikkert end Microsoft windows (og andre lukkede systemer). Listen over kendte sikkerhedshuller i Microsoft software, der har fået lov til at eksistere uden sikkerhedsopdateringer i ugevis, er lang…

Men i sidste ende handler software sikkerhed om tillid. Ingen almindelige brugere kan forstå og overskue alle programmer og koden der ligger bag. Jeg har det bedst med at opgaven med løbende at udarbejde sikkerhedsopdateringer varetages i en åben proces (som det sker med open source) og ikke under lukkede forhold, hvor udarbejdelse af og kontrol med sikkerhedsopdateringer er begrænset til nogle få udvalgte medarbejdere indenfor et enkelt firma.